SOUND-LETTER ASSOCIATION AND SOUND BLENDING IN PRESCHOOL CHILDREN’S EARLY READING

Muhaida Akmal Mohamad, Shameem Rafik-Galea

Abstract


Reading instruction in English to preschool children has been a central issue among reading instructors for decades.  It has always centred on whether to begin teaching the children using the lower level or the higher level skills. This paper addresses the issue of teaching preschool children the sound-letter association and sound blending at an early stage when reading in English. Specifically, it focuses on the intervention of sound-letter association in order to demonstrate that learning the sound-letter association first will help preschool children to blend the sounds and eventually to be able to read fluently. We discuss the approaches used and provide evidence based on the pre and post- test results. Our findings indicate that the sound-letter association and sound blending as skills must be acquired by preschool children before they begin to learn reading as it scaffolds their ability to see how sounds and alphabets are related and to read words. We argue that introducing to preschool children sound-letter association and sound blending before moving them into real reading will make them better readers.

 


Keywords


SOUND-LETTER ASSOCIATION, EARLY READING, PRESCHOOL, SOUND BLENDING, SYNTHETIC PHONICS, ALPHABETIC PRINCIPLE

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bowey, J. a. (2006). Need for systematic synthetic phonics teaching within the early reading curriculum. Australian Psychologist, 41(2), 79–84. doi:10.1080/00050060600610334

Cohen, J. (1973). Eta-Squared and Partial Eta -Squared in Fixed Factor Anova Designs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33(1), 107–12.

Cummings, K. D., Dewey, E. N., Latimer, R. J., & Iii, R. H. G. (2011). Pathways to Word Reading and Decoding : The Roles of Automaticity and Accuracy. School Psychology Review, 40(2), 284–295.

DiLorenzo, K. E., Rody, C. a., Bucholz, J. L., & Brady, M. P. (2011). Teaching Letter–Sound Connections With Picture Mnemonics: Itchy’s Alphabet and Early Decoding. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 55(1), 28–34. doi:10.1080/10459880903286763

Dooner, J. (2012). A practical approach to implementing phonics in the classroom. Practically Primary, 17(1), 31–33.

Fien, H., Park, Y., Baker, S. K., Smith, J. L. M., Stoolmiller, M., & Kame, E. J. (2010). An Examination of the Relation of Nonsense Word Fluency Initial Status and Gains to Reading Outcomes for Beginning Readers. School Psychology Review, 39(4), 631–653.

Harn, B. a, Stoolmiller, M., & Chard, D. J. (2008) . Measuring the dimensions of alphabetic principle on the reading development of first graders: the role of automaticity and unitization. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(2), 143–57. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18354934

Hudson, R. F., Torgesen, J. K., Lane, H. B., & Turner, S. J. (2012). Relations among reading skills and sub-skills and text-level reading proficiency in developing readers. Reading and Writing, 25, 483–507

Krashen, S. (2008). Does intensive decoding instruction contribute to reading comprehension? Knowledge Quest, 37(4), 72–74.

McGeown, S. P., & Medford, E. (2014). Using method of instruction to predict the skills supporting initial reading development: insight from a synthetic phonics approach. Reading and Writing, 27(3), 591–608. doi:10.1007/s11145-013-9460-5

National Reading Panel. (2000a). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implication for reading instruction.

National Reading Panel. (2000b). Teaching Children to Read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction : Reports from the subgroups. Retrieved from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/Documents/report.pdf

Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS Survival manual (4th editio.). Berkshire: McGraw Hill.

Rose, J. (2005) . Phonics Final Report - the Rose Review. Education Journal Document, (45), 28. Retrieved from www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/rosereview

Su, S., & Hawkins, J. (2013). THRASS Phonics: A case stsudy of Thomas as an emerging reader in English. The English Teacher, XLII(April), 52–73.

Torgesen, J., Rashotte, C., & Alexander, A. (2001). Principles of fluency instruc- tion in reading: Relationships with established empirical outcomes. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 333–355). Timonium, MD: York Press.

Wyse, D., & Goswami, U. (2008). Synthetic phonics and the teaching of reading. British Educational Research Journal, 34(6), 691–710. doi:10.1080/01411920802268912




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24200/mjll.vol3iss1pp78-93

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.






Attribution -CC BY

This journal and its content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


Flag Counter