Siti Zaidah Zainuddin, Shameem Rafik-Galea


A persistent concern in many Asian schools today is the quality of students’ thought processes. Critical-thinking skills are important to meet the present global expectations and challenges. Often, students find it difficult to think critically and need a great deal of structured guidance when completing tasks which require higher-order thinking skills, such as argumentative writing.  Though important, argumentative writing is a challenging mode of discourse not only for L2 students, but also for a large majority of L1 students, because they too, think critically and reason logically. This paper presents and discusses an approach that uses the Toulmin’s model of logical reasoning, which incorporates questioning techniques to provide scaffolding for students’ argumentative writing and critical-thinking ability. This paper illustrates how students with low language ability were able to learn how to think constructively and develop appropriate critical-thinking skills for argumentative writing. Pedagogical considerations for enhancing the teaching and learning of argumentative writing for teachers and ESL practitioners alike are suggested.



Full Text:



Annamalai, S., & Muniandy, B. (2013). Reading habit and attitude among Malaysian polytechnic students. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(1), 32-41.

Andrews, R. (1995). Teaching and learning arguments. London.

Applebee, A.N., Langer, J.A., & Mullis, I.V.S. (1986). Writing: Trends across the decade, 1974-1984. Princeton, NJ: The National Assessment of Educational Progress.

Beyer, B.K. (1987). Practical strategies for the teaching of thinking. United States: Simon and Shuster.

Burkhalter, N. (1995). A Vygotsky-based curriculum for teaching persuasive writing in the elementary grades. Language Arts, 72, 192-199.

Cavina, K. (1995). Critical thinking and writing. Belmont, CA: Wadworth Publishing Company.

Cooper et al., (1984). Studying the writing abilities of a university freshman class: strategies from a case study. R. Beach, L.S. Bridwell (Eds.), New Directions in Composition Research, The Guilford Press, New York (1984), pp. 19–52.

Crammond, J.G. (1998). The uses and complexity of argument structures in expert and student persuasive writing. Written Communication, 15, 230-268.

Crowhurst, M. (1991). Interrelationships between reading and writing persuasive discourse. Research in the Teaching of English, 25(3), 314-338.

Cunningham, A.E., & Stanovich, K.E. (2001). What reading does for the mind. Journal of Direct Instruction, 1(2), 137-149.

D’Angelo, E. (1975). A conceptual theory of rhetoric. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.

D’Angelo, E. (1991). The teaching of critical thinking. Amsterdam: Br. Gruner.

Durst, R. (1987). Cognitive and linguistic demands of analytic writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 21(4), 347-378.

Ferris, D. (1994). Rhetorical strategies in student persuasive writing: Differences between native and non-native English speakers. Research in the teaching of English, 28(1), 44-64.

Flower, L. and Hayes, J.R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication. 32(4), 365-387.

Grabe, W., & Stoller, F.L. (1997). Reading and vocabulary development in a second language: A case study. In Coady, J., and Huckin, T.N. (Eds.), Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition: A rationale for Pedagogy (pp. 98-122). USA: Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. (1990). A genre description of argumentative essay. RELC Journal, 21, 66-78.

Karbach, J. (1987). Using Toulmin’s model of argumentation. Journal of Teaching Writing, 6, 81-91.

Khodabandeh, F. (2014). Argumentation across L1 and L2: Examinations of three instructional treatments of genre-based approach to teaching writing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 968-975.

Kim, J.Y., &Anderson, T. (2011). Reading across curriculum: A framework for improving the reading abilities and habits of college students. Journal of College Literacy and Learning, 37, 29-40.

Knudson, R.E. (1992). The development of written argumentation: An analysis and comparison of argumentative writing at four grade levels. Child Study Journal, 22, 167-184.

Krashen, S.D. (1993). The power of reading. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.

Langer, J. A. & Applebee, B. N. (1987). How writing shapes thinking. National Council of Teachers of English. Illinois.

Lee, S.H. (2006). The Use of Interpersonal Resources in Argumentative-Persuasive Essays by East-Asian ESL and Australian Tertiary Students. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Sydney.

Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Matsuhashi, A., & Gordon, E. (1985). Revision, addition and the power of unseen text. In S.W. Freedman (Ed.), The acquisition of written language: Revision and response (pp.226-249). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Mc Cann, Thomas M. (1989). Student argumentative writing knowledge and ability at three grade levels. Research in the Teaching of English, 23(1), 62-76. Medway, P. (1990). Argument as social action. In Andrews, R. (Ed.), Narrative and argument (pp22-32). Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Middleton, R. (1990). Argument, persuasion and the ironic voice. English in Education, 24(1), 68-76.

Mitchell, S. (1997). Competing and consensual voices: the theory and practice of argument. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Mitchell, S. & Riddle, M. (2000). Improving the quality of argument in higher education: final report, School of Lifelong Learning and Education, Middlesex University.

MJZ Abidin, M. Pour-Mohammadi & Anita (2011). A survey online reading habits of rural secondary school students in Malaysia. International Journal of Linguistics, 3(1).

Nicholl, B. (1993). Critical thinking: Developing a critical thinking environment for child development students. Paper presented at the National Association for Education of Young Children Conference. Anaheim, C.A. Perelman, C.H. (1982). The realm of rhetoric (W. Kluback, Trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

Normazidah Che Musa, Y. L. Koo and Hazita Azman. (2012). Exploring English language learning and teaching in Malaysia. Journal of Language Studies, 12(1): 35–51.

Pandian, A. (2000). A study on readership behaviour among multi-ethnic, multi-lingual Malaysian students. Paper presented at the 8th International Literacy and Educational Research Network (LERN) Conference on Learning, RMIT University, Melbourne, July 5-9.

Qin, J. & Karaback, E. (2010). The analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing, System, 38, 444-456.

Ramage, J.D., Bean, J.C. & Johnson, J. (2001). Writing arguments. Mass: Allyn & Bacon.

Rudinow, J. and V.E. Barry. (1994). Initiation to critical thinking. Orlando: Harcourt Brace College Publisher. Schroeder, C. (1997). Knowledge and power, logic and rhetoric, and other reflections in the Toulminian mirror: a critical consideration of Stephen Toulmin’s contribution to composition. Assessed on 12 February 2005.

Seyler, D.U. (1994). Understanding arguments: A text with readings. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.

Phillips, S.B. (2014). Argument structure in learner writing: A corpus-based analysis using argument mapping. Kajian Malaysia, 30(1), 45-77.

Tan Shin Yen & Siti Hajar Halili. (2015). Effective teaching of higher order thinking (HOT) in education. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 3(2), 41-47.

Thomson, A. (2000). Critical reasoning: A practical introduction. New York: Routledge.

Toulmin, S.E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Toulmin, (2003). The Uses of Argument. (updated ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003).

Vargese, S.A. & Abraham, S.A. (1998). Undergraduates arguing a case. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 286-306.

Walton, D.N., Reed,C., & Macagno,F.(2008). Argumentation schemes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; New York.

Warren, J.E. (2010). Taming the warrant in Toulmin’s model of argument. The English Journal, 99(6), 41-46.

Wood, N.V. (1995). Perspectives on argument. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24200/mjll.vol5iss2pp114-133


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Attribution -CC BY

This journal and its content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Flag Counter